Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
- Downloads：5959
- Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
- Create Date：2021-07-16 09:56:13
- Update Date：2025-09-06
- Status：finish
- Author：Max Tegmark
- ISBN：0241954630
- Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
- Download
Summary
The ideas of one of the most original cosmologists at work today--accessible， anecdotal， animated by the author's wit and passion--which will fascinate readers of Brian Greene， Roger Penrose， and Ray Kurzweil。
Max Tegmark leads us on an astonishing journey through past， present， and future， and through the physics， astronomy， and mathematics that are the foundation of his work， most particularly his hypothesis that our physical reality is a mathematical structure and his theory of the ultimate multiverse。 In a dazzling combination of both popular and groundbreaking science， he not only helps us grasp his often mind-boggling theories （his website gives a flavor of how they might boggle the mind）， but he also shares with us some of the often surprising triumphs and disappointments that have shaped his life as a scientist。 Fascinating from first to last--here is a book for the full science-reading spectrum。
Max Tegmark leads us on an astonishing journey through past， present， and future， and through the physics， astronomy， and mathematics that are the foundation of his work， most particularly his hypothesis that our physical reality is a mathematical structure and his theory of the ultimate multiverse。 In a dazzling combination of both popular and groundbreaking science， he not only helps us grasp his often mind-boggling theories （his website gives a flavor of how they might boggle the mind）， but he also shares with us some of the often surprising triumphs and disappointments that have shaped his life as a scientist。 Fascinating from first to last--here is a book for the full science-reading spectrum。
Reviews
Spencer
，
One of the clearest explanations of cosmology and quantum physics。 Many of the arguments for and against modern theories （and tegmark’s own Mathematical Universe Hypothesis） are difficult to understand and evaluate。 Overall， I think these arguments “presume” far too much。
Arvind
，
This book is a confluence of seemingly disparate topics ranging from the cosmology， physics and mathematics （as the title would have you guess） to very esoteric themes around consciousness， philosophy， solipsism and metaphysics。 Indeed， since all of these modalities are encompassed in the definition of the "Ultimate Nature of Reality" it doesn't surprise the reader - who is gracefully guided through the book with Prof。 Tegmark's elegant arguments - that a synoptic worldview is not only necessary This book is a confluence of seemingly disparate topics ranging from the cosmology， physics and mathematics （as the title would have you guess） to very esoteric themes around consciousness， philosophy， solipsism and metaphysics。 Indeed， since all of these modalities are encompassed in the definition of the "Ultimate Nature of Reality" it doesn't surprise the reader - who is gracefully guided through the book with Prof。 Tegmark's elegant arguments - that a synoptic worldview is not only necessary but inevitable。 Reading this in parallel with books on non-dualism， seemed almost complementary and not the least bit jarring。As for how the book reads， I can make a comparison that might resonate with LOTR fans - which is also divided in three parts。 Part I introduces you to things that should constitute reasonably common knowledge， at least amongst readers with a penchant for （astro）physics （The Fellowship while amazing is largely along expected lines for a fantasy and can be appreciated by mostly everyone）。 Part II stuns and shocks you with details about what you think you knew - things get fairly technical and can be off-putting to a casual reader who isn't already quasi familiar with some of the concepts （The Two Towers can either propel you along the story， or be confusing and frustrating with its weirdness if you are just dabbling in the genre）。 Part III is truly & utterly mindbending and demands as well as retains your rapt attention to every single line - and while painfully slow to make progress， leaves you with a sense of accomplishment for having digested the content （The Return of the King is the pinnacle of the trilogy， that takes one to another level， and delivers a fitting climax to return to the roots of where the story began）。 Both of Prof' Tegmark's books are masterpieces， and although I read them in the reverse order， it seems to make more sense this way。 。。。more
Travis Cottreau
，
Absolutely mind blowing and insane really - in the best possible way。I have no idea how much of the description of a many-layered multiverse is real。 I don't even know if inflation is real - it always felt like a mathematical kludge to me， but who knows？ I'm not a cosmologist。So much of this stuff is over my head， even dumbed down the way it is by an excellent explainer like Tegmark。 I don't get how the universe is， but it will be non-intuitive I suspect。I had one question which I wanted to ask Absolutely mind blowing and insane really - in the best possible way。I have no idea how much of the description of a many-layered multiverse is real。 I don't even know if inflation is real - it always felt like a mathematical kludge to me， but who knows？ I'm not a cosmologist。So much of this stuff is over my head， even dumbed down the way it is by an excellent explainer like Tegmark。 I don't get how the universe is， but it will be non-intuitive I suspect。I had one question which I wanted to ask the author， but I have no idea how to reach him: I appreciated the mathematical beauty of the many w0rlds/Everett interpretation， but didn't know how our nearest neighbors （i。e。 when we split in half due to a quantum event） don't interact - surely， there would be gravity from the 2nd earth that just "appeared" due to some quantum event？I'm not quite sure how this works。 。。。more
Victoria
，
I know that the phrase “this book changed my life” is cliche， but I will use it now to describe Tegmark’s work。 It rekindled a love of logic， an interest in astronomy and cosmology， and it inspired me to be more scientifically minded and active in our role as an intelligent species in the universe - I mean， which of four multiverses that universe may occur in is beside the point。 I can’t recommend it enough for its colloquial and friendly approach to writing and truly breaking down difficult con I know that the phrase “this book changed my life” is cliche， but I will use it now to describe Tegmark’s work。 It rekindled a love of logic， an interest in astronomy and cosmology， and it inspired me to be more scientifically minded and active in our role as an intelligent species in the universe - I mean， which of four multiverses that universe may occur in is beside the point。 I can’t recommend it enough for its colloquial and friendly approach to writing and truly breaking down difficult concepts into understandable bites （or bits）。 。。。more
Agneta Lind
，
Ska ärligt säga att jag enbart läste 125 sidor sen tröttnade jag。 Mitt intresse för innehållet var inte så stort som jag trodde。
Prabidhik KC
，
Amazing book for science enthusiasts
Stephanie
，
I think this may be my favorite book of all time。 Max Tegmark is an insanely personable writer。 What a casual tone， and for describing such mind blowing ideas！ He really does quest for the ultimate nature of reality - and provides the reader with a very satisfying answer！ I especially love the last chapter， when Tegmark brings it all home （literally）。 His outlook on life is beautiful - I couldn’t help but cry throughout most of the chapter - and his call to action is inspiring。 This book has for I think this may be my favorite book of all time。 Max Tegmark is an insanely personable writer。 What a casual tone， and for describing such mind blowing ideas！ He really does quest for the ultimate nature of reality - and provides the reader with a very satisfying answer！ I especially love the last chapter， when Tegmark brings it all home （literally）。 His outlook on life is beautiful - I couldn’t help but cry throughout most of the chapter - and his call to action is inspiring。 This book has forever changed my understanding of our world and universe， and our place in it all。 Thank you， Max Tegmark。 。。。more
Yannis
，
An amazing book that mixes Physics and Philosophy。 Amazingly well popularised， it reminds you the basics of Physics and makes you discover the different Multiverses， our Reality and our place in it。
shannon
，
The first half was a good survey of modern cosmology。 The latter half？ I’ll defer to others who say that Tegmark’s “Man Max” nickname is well-earned。
John Wegener
，
AN interesting read of Max's view of our reality。 Not a read for the lighthearted as it stretches a person's understanding of physics。 But the ideas expressed pose interesting questions。 AN interesting read of Max's view of our reality。 Not a read for the lighthearted as it stretches a person's understanding of physics。 But the ideas expressed pose interesting questions。 。。。more
Ryan Young
，
i’m finding the “proof” of a multiverse less and less convincing every time i read it。 and i see nothing useful about assuming that reality is literally just math。 what could that mean？ i like max and i like his way of thinking。 but the main arguments of the book were not proven。
Matt Mayevsky
，
Better than a science fiction book！
Paige McLoughlin
，
I read this shortly after it came out and it is an excellent introduction to modern cosmology。 The first part is a great exposition of the current science of cosmology at the time of publishing big bang 13。8 billion years ago， inflation， dark matter， dark energy， Cosmic Microwave Background， Planck， WMAP， and all that。 The second half of the book is speculations on the multiverse and Max has four flavors， Quilted Multiverse， Inflationary multiverse and string landscape， Everett's many worlds of I read this shortly after it came out and it is an excellent introduction to modern cosmology。 The first part is a great exposition of the current science of cosmology at the time of publishing big bang 13。8 billion years ago， inflation， dark matter， dark energy， Cosmic Microwave Background， Planck， WMAP， and all that。 The second half of the book is speculations on the multiverse and Max has four flavors， Quilted Multiverse， Inflationary multiverse and string landscape， Everett's many worlds of quantum mechanics， and finally， the Mathematical Universe hypothesis that our universe a mathematical object （complex enough for conscious observers） among every possible mathematical object， in other words， we a mathematical object in Plato's heaven of the forms。 I have no idea if it is right but I enjoy thinking and speculating on it。https://youtu。be/rPeBEcsmWTYhttps://youtu。be/EqiFctHm6y4 。。。more
Gfec
，
3，99* about 100 pages overflowed （ in hypotheses is text not so much for me， because just only hypotheses ， for example multiversum III a IV details connected to miscallenous axioms， physics theory and never probably approached by our skills & science & also in distance travelling in future， there are else many repeatings of facts ， 2-3 ok， but sometimes are more ）， rest is fine reading buth not for everyone ， well， IT is "hard technical" scientific book and demands college education or knowledg 3，99* about 100 pages overflowed （ in hypotheses is text not so much for me， because just only hypotheses ， for example multiversum III a IV details connected to miscallenous axioms， physics theory and never probably approached by our skills & science & also in distance travelling in future， there are else many repeatings of facts ， 2-3 ok， but sometimes are more ）， rest is fine reading buth not for everyone ， well， IT is "hard technical" scientific book and demands college education or knowledge 。。。more
James
，
An interesting take on some of the bigger questions in our universe， from multiverses to the maths behind cosmology。 A bit too autobiographical at times for me， which doesn't make sense to me as someone in academia about to go through many of the situations Tegmark described。 Tegmark does communicate the ideas here at a good， basic level as required on the whole， but as with most books on complex physics topics， the topics become so complicated by the end that its hard to sell them to a lay audi An interesting take on some of the bigger questions in our universe， from multiverses to the maths behind cosmology。 A bit too autobiographical at times for me， which doesn't make sense to me as someone in academia about to go through many of the situations Tegmark described。 Tegmark does communicate the ideas here at a good， basic level as required on the whole， but as with most books on complex physics topics， the topics become so complicated by the end that its hard to sell them to a lay audience。 。。。more
AJ Green
，
Very， very interesting。Unfortunately， like so many books written by leftists， Mr。 Tegmark couldn’t resist using his scientific credibility （and the last part of his book） to discuss the psycho-leftist-alarmist garbage about so-called “existential threats” to humanity （like nuclear war， artificial intelligence， and global warming）。Sadly， leftists are always sneaky and dishonest。 Leftist authors typically write a book about a particular subject and title it accordingly， but one of the MAIN things Very， very interesting。Unfortunately， like so many books written by leftists， Mr。 Tegmark couldn’t resist using his scientific credibility （and the last part of his book） to discuss the psycho-leftist-alarmist garbage about so-called “existential threats” to humanity （like nuclear war， artificial intelligence， and global warming）。Sadly， leftists are always sneaky and dishonest。 Leftist authors typically write a book about a particular subject and title it accordingly， but one of the MAIN things they consistently do is use the reader’s interest in a particular subject to “backdoor” the reader with leftist environmental-wacko dogma/nonsense。It happens constantly。 Read a book about birds。。。 BAM！ The last chapter is about global warming。 Read a book about the makeup of space-time。。。 BAM！ Another leftist global warming lecture。 Read a book about mathematics， or politics， or history， or engineering， or chemistry， BAM！ More leftist political ideology lamely disguised as “science。”STOP IT！ 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮For the record， I can see myself reading this again。。。 but skipping the last part。 。。。more
Sandeep Bhat
，
Our Mathematical universe can be termed a highly technical book with prerequisite knowledge of physics and mathematics instrumental in understanding the contents better。 Going into detail of everything in nearly every concept， be it parallel universes， different level in Multiverses or the quantum interpretation， Max Tegmark makes sure to start from the very basics。 If not interested in these areas， then the book will be lot of prose and then recommended to jump to the summary。 First couple of c Our Mathematical universe can be termed a highly technical book with prerequisite knowledge of physics and mathematics instrumental in understanding the contents better。 Going into detail of everything in nearly every concept， be it parallel universes， different level in Multiverses or the quantum interpretation， Max Tegmark makes sure to start from the very basics。 If not interested in these areas， then the book will be lot of prose and then recommended to jump to the summary。 First couple of chapters and last 2 chapters tend to be thought provoking and understandable to all readers。 The author also describes shortly about evolution of AI which can be seen in detail in Life 3。0， another book by the same author。 The mathematical treatment on middle chapters tend to be advanced and recommended for readers who are researching in specific areas。 。。。more
Donald S
，
totally amazing。 One of the most interesting books I have ever read。 SO many new ideas！ I am not certain Dr。 Tegmark is correct， but he is certainly one of the most creative thinkers I have ever read。 Highly recommended， and read it slowly！
Adam Lee
，
Give this book to anyone who thinks Politics is important。
Katy Corderoy
，
Do I agree？ Perhaps not。 But did I enjoy reading this？ Thinking about these issues？ Yep！ I really did。 I found the second half a tougher read， but the first two sections “Zooming Out” and “Zooming In” really had me gripped and I could sense Tegmark’s passion for physics and mathematics influencing me。
Ian
，
I have a hard time rating non fiction。 I could argue this one falls anywhere from 3 to 5。 I picked up this book because I was interested in learning more about dark matter， dark energy， theories on how the universe is evolving， and the multiverse。 Not the science fiction-y ‘multiverse’ out of a comic book， but like the actual theories in physics。 Basically， I wanted something that was more detailed and technical than a ten minute youtube video， but also more interesting and less bland than a tex I have a hard time rating non fiction。 I could argue this one falls anywhere from 3 to 5。 I picked up this book because I was interested in learning more about dark matter， dark energy， theories on how the universe is evolving， and the multiverse。 Not the science fiction-y ‘multiverse’ out of a comic book， but like the actual theories in physics。 Basically， I wanted something that was more detailed and technical than a ten minute youtube video， but also more interesting and less bland than a textbook。This book WAS exactly what I wanted。 Max Tegmark did a good job not only walking through the more fantastical theories in physics over the last few years， providing interesting analogies and graphics to help me understand them， but also making it personal。 He stops for frequent personal anecdotes from his career to tell us how he learned about these concepts。 It’s his personal journey。 This makes the book longer， but helped make it feel more like a story and a bit easier to read。 Even when I wasn’t fully grasping what he was saying， and those moments were rare （to his credit not mine）， I was interested。I’m docking it a star because I did lose steam at some parts。 I don’t really think this was the book’s fault， more just a vague personal rut I hit。 Nevertheless， I can’t shake that sense， so I suppose that’s a subjective star。 On top of that， I think its target audience is probably pretty small – its maybe more than a layperson would want， but less than a physicist would need。 That’s exactly what I was looking for， but I’m not sure how many people would get satisfaction out of it。 To his credit， there’s a little chart at the front of the book that neatly breaks down which chapters can be skipped by people familiar with things like quantum mechanics， and also detailing which chapters are well established science （or at least consensus for the time being）， and which are fringe theory。 I appreciated that。In conclusion， I would recommend this if I got the sense anyone out there was looking for the same thing I was when I picked it up。 But I’d be pretty selective about that， warning them the book is a bit more than ‘popular science’ but not quite ‘scientific literature’。 。。。more
Albert Ahnfelt
，
Max är ingen vetenskapsboomer。 Vissa delar av boken var lite tung， men det mesta gick att förstå och var intressant。
Liz Nieters
，
This book was interesting， but it went a bit over my head。 I listened to it as an audio book， so maybe it would be easier to understand if I read it instead of listening to it
Sarah
，
He lost me somewhere around chapter 11， and I thought chapter 13 largely unnecessary， but thoroughly enjoyed the earlier sections of the book。 NB that’s largely despite， not because of， the anecdotal tone in much of the earlier chapters， most of which I could do without。
Lois Sayrs
，
I love this genre of physics， cosmology， philosophy。 Tegmark has the credentials to attempt this effort and has been engaged in a great deal of research on interrelated topics to be asked to write such a book but this effort for its many good points， also falls short。 The author loves his topic， and loves talking about how we think about the universe as much as he likes doing his research。 The book exposes the reader to Tegmark’s life as a theoretical physicist。 Yes， very academic but many engag I love this genre of physics， cosmology， philosophy。 Tegmark has the credentials to attempt this effort and has been engaged in a great deal of research on interrelated topics to be asked to write such a book but this effort for its many good points， also falls short。 The author loves his topic， and loves talking about how we think about the universe as much as he likes doing his research。 The book exposes the reader to Tegmark’s life as a theoretical physicist。 Yes， very academic but many engaging stories and experiences are retold。 His own insight seems quietly shelved and possibly would have added more pathos to his effort。 His writing style is choppy and construct-driven， like a teacher trying to introduce concepts to build to a point。 And like a lot of math classes we have all taken， the reader may not exactly be sure of the point。 The footnotes are dazzling。 His research contributions and description of how we know what we know to date about our universe is fabulous。 Overall， the feel of the book feels unedited。 I think in part because the book is structured in discrete chunks and also the writing feels rushed， even a little lazy。 Tegmark admits to being a creature of publishing at the last minute and while this may work for template scientific papers， this book demanded better editing。 In the end， I feel Tegmark’s editor is in large part to blame for the book’s shortcomings。 Im not a physicist but I am a scientist with a lot of math training I use in my work。 In my view， I feel Tegmark does not make a compelling case that there is a significant difference between the universe having mathematical architectures and the universe “being” mathematical。 If there is a difference between the two， I missed it。 。。。more
D
，
（3。5 rounded up）。 At first the style was a bit irrritating but the contents made up for it。 See also this review， which goes into much more detail on this whole book。 Some extra considerations:- In the first part， I especially liked the clear rationale for introducing inflation as "the gift that keeps on giving"。 -I am puzzled by the "reality is a mathematical structure" story。 What else would it be？ Mathematically/logically speaking， if you have a theory describing reality it must be mathemati （3。5 rounded up）。 At first the style was a bit irrritating but the contents made up for it。 See also this review， which goes into much more detail on this whole book。 Some extra considerations:- In the first part， I especially liked the clear rationale for introducing inflation as "the gift that keeps on giving"。 -I am puzzled by the "reality is a mathematical structure" story。 What else would it be？ Mathematically/logically speaking， if you have a theory describing reality it must be mathematical （what else？） and therefore， reality is a mathematical model of this theory， assuming the theory is correct。 What is the big deal， I wonder。 Maybe it's me。 As a side note， I couldn't help wondering whether it should be the 'smallest' model （in some sense）， i。e。 there is nothing in reality that is not described by the theory。 - The last part should have been removed。 The concept of 'scientific lifestyle' is undefined。 。。。more
Diego Pacheco
，
Good Book。 Some ideas are very interesting such as "quantum suicide"。 Lots of theories。 Not as good as life 3。0 but still an interesting book bit a bit long。 Good Book。 Some ideas are very interesting such as "quantum suicide"。 Lots of theories。 Not as good as life 3。0 but still an interesting book bit a bit long。 。。。more
Klaudijus Valintėlis
，
Gave it a four stars just in case i did not understand some of the arguments（or physics）。 First half of the book is review of current state and history of physics， which at times felt like a dry， fast paced textbook。 Second part of the book goes into more speculative and philosophical ponderings about multiverses that surounds us and ultimately the great idea that everything around us are mathematical structures and constructs。 Can surely get some nice ideas and thinking out of that， but felt re Gave it a four stars just in case i did not understand some of the arguments（or physics）。 First half of the book is review of current state and history of physics， which at times felt like a dry， fast paced textbook。 Second part of the book goes into more speculative and philosophical ponderings about multiverses that surounds us and ultimately the great idea that everything around us are mathematical structures and constructs。 Can surely get some nice ideas and thinking out of that， but felt really anoyed by conclusions drawn out of this framework。 Other huge questions which could probably fill blank books easily are dismissed as trivial and without any further consideration or explanation （for example something along those lines "if universe is random， then there would be no reason to evolve brain"。 What？ Under what obligation is universe to make sense at all？）。 At some parts i thought it could be my own ignorance and uninformedness（which very well might be） but it was all over the pages again again。 Anyways pretty long book， but worth a go， especially if need some help wrapping your head around vastness of space and multiverses。 。。。more
Puja Killa
，
Wow！ This book is phenomenal。 Phenomenally fun and phenomenally whacky。 I couldn’t make sense of large chunks and found many abstract concepts truly perplexing。 But the author assures that many of the renowned theoretical physicists can’t understand some of those either so the reader should take heart。 The topics have been dumbed down a lot for them to be somewhat comprehensible for an average reader with very basic physics or mathematics prior knowledge （like myself） but with an interest in the Wow！ This book is phenomenal。 Phenomenally fun and phenomenally whacky。 I couldn’t make sense of large chunks and found many abstract concepts truly perplexing。 But the author assures that many of the renowned theoretical physicists can’t understand some of those either so the reader should take heart。 The topics have been dumbed down a lot for them to be somewhat comprehensible for an average reader with very basic physics or mathematics prior knowledge （like myself） but with an interest in the topics of parallel universes， quantum mechanics， workings of human mind， reality， consciousness etc。 The humour in the book surely helped me to keep on trying to make sense of these elusive concepts which bordered on philosophy in many instances。 。。。more
Lane
，